Why Do People Hate Daniel Kaluuya?
Daniel Kaluuya is an English actor who rose to international prominence in 2017 for his lead role in the horror film “Get Out.”
Despite his obvious talent and critical acclaim, Kaluuya has faced some backlash and hate from certain groups online. In this article, we’ll explore the major reasons why some people seem to dislike the actor.
Rumors About Racist Remarks
One of the main reasons stems from rumors and allegations that Kaluuya made racist remarks and perpetuated negative stereotypes about black people early in his career.
The “Skins” Controversy
The rumors connect back to Kaluuya’s role on the British teen drama “Skins” in 2009. He played the character of Posh Kenneth,described as a drug dealer and gang leader. Some critics accused the show of promoting offensive stereotypes about black youth.
While Kaluuya has distanced himself from the role, some still attempt to tie him to that controversial character. However, these remain rumors without definitive proof behind the more extreme accusations.
Unverified Comments
There were also unverified reports that Kaluuya made comments around that time disparaging the black community. However, the actor has denied these claims.
Without clear evidence, it’s best not to put much stock in unspecified online allegations from over a decade ago.
Perceived Lack of “Blackness”
Another source of negativity towards Kaluuya comes from some perceiving him as not “black enough” in his real life persona and acting roles.
Talking “Proper”
Part of this ties into Kaluuya speaking Received Pronunciation or “proper English.” Some believe this makes him appear less authentic in representing the black experience.
However, Kaluuya has spoken openly about coming from a working class London family, so these complaints about his accent likely miss the mark.
Non-Stereotypical Roles
Others argue Kaluuya’s often serious, dramatic roles don’t provide the “strong black lead” some audiences want. However, the diversity of black experiences depicted in film and television should be seen as a positive.
Resentment After “Get Out”
Finally, another source of animosity stems from those who believe Kaluuya didn’t “deserve” the success of “Get Out.”
Perceived Special Treatment
Some accuse Kaluuya of benefiting from special treatment as a black British actor tapped to play African-American roles. There’s a sense that the slot should have gone to an African-American performer.
However, Jordan Peele as writer/director clearly felt Kaluuya was the best fit for the specific role in his creative vision. Race and nationality did not appear to be primary factors.
Resentment of an Outsider
For those who feel black American stories should strictly feature black American performers, Kaluuya is viewed as an outsider capitalizing on opportunities here. The historic barriers African-American actors face in the industry likely fuel this resentment.
However, Kaluuya has proven his acting abilities time and again. His background should not be a barrier, especially when judged against his compelling on-screen performances.
Has Kaluuya Provoked Backlash Himself?
Amidst the criticisms, some also question whether Kaluuya has made matters worse at times with his own words or actions.
Calling Out Black Press
In 2018, Kaluuya declined to do press with some black outlets for his role in “Black Panther.” He cited the harsh treatment black artists can receive.
This caused a backlash from those who felt he generalized too broadly or should have embraced black media.
Perceived Arrogance
Kaluuya has also faced scrutiny for coming across as arrogant or “full of himself” during interviews. Some read his very assured and direct communication style as off-putting.
However, he seems to simply be a confident personality who gives candid opinions. Kaluuya just needs to be aware of potential optics issues.
Friction With Other Black Talent?
Rumors have also circulated about Kaluuya having rifts with other black creatives like Ryan Coogler during “Black Panther.” But nothing substantial has emerged, and could just be fabricated drama.
In reality, these rumors of diva behavior seem overblown. There are no verified accounts of serious disputes from his co-stars or directors.
Conclusion: Unfair Attacks Reflect Broader Issues
In looking at the major sources of hatred directed at Daniel Kaluuya online, much of it does not stand up to closer scrutiny. Outrageous claims from his past remain unproven, while many current attacks boil down to unjustified critiques of how he navigates being a black artist with a global platform.
Ultimately, the vitriol reflects deeper issues with how our society views and treats young black talents attempting to thrive in the arts and entertainment industry. The discourse too often seeks to unfairly pigeonhole black performers based on rigid notions of culture and identity.
As Kaluuya himself noted, “We’re in a time where people have the opportunity to show themselves and tell their stories in a way that we’ve never been allowed to do before.”
Rather than rush to judgment or create false narratives, we should make the effort to appreciate his performances and evaluate Daniel Kaluuya in his full complexity as an individual.
The evidence simply does not support writing off someone with his obvious gifts due to rumors or perceived slights. Kaluuya deserves to be judged on his merits as an actor and artist.
Frequently Asked Questions About Daniel Kaluuya Hate
Why do some people accuse Daniel Kaluuya of being racist or anti-black?
The main accusations stem from rumors about racist remarks he allegedly made early in his career around his controversial “Skins” role. However, there is no definitive proof behind these claims from over a decade ago.
How has Kaluuya responded to criticisms about not being “black enough”?
Kaluuya has spoken openly about coming from a working class London background and not letting notions of “authentic blackness” limit him as a performer. He aims to play roles that showcase the diversity of black experiences.
Did Kaluuya make a mistake calling out the black press?
Some viewed his comments as overly dismissive, while others argued he had fair concerns about treatment black talents can receive. But he could have framed his critiques in a less generalized manner.
What are examples of Kaluuya allegedly acting arrogant or entitled?
Critics often cite interviews where they believe Kaluuya comes across as too self-assured or candid with his opinions. However, these traits may just reflect his confident personality.
Is there any truth to rumors he clashed with Ryan Coogler or others?
There are no verified accounts of serious on-set disputes. Rumors of friction with collaborators like Coogler appear to be unsubstantiated drama. Kaluuya maintains good relationships with frequent collaborators.
Why does Kaluuya playing African-American roles anger some people?
Some believe roles depicting the black American experience should strictly go to African-American performers. They see Kaluuya as an outsider taking opportunities from those actors.
How has the broader industry set up unfair expectations for black talents like Kaluuya?
Society often unfairly pigeonholes black performers based on rigid notions of culture/identity. Kaluuya aims to showcase diversity of black experiences, not feed into stereotypes.
Should Daniel Kaluuya ignore or respond to his haters?
The evidence shows most criticism stems from misinformation, so engaging with haters often gives them undeserved attention. Kaluuya is better served focusing on his work and speaking out against industry-wide systemic issues.